Tokuhei Nishizu + Kane Yasutake
A NUMIDENT-derived Social Security record names them as the parents of Nobujiro Nishizu, born 30 October 1877 in Fukuoka.
A public-record reconstruction for John Yamao Nishizu and Trudes Tsuyako (Osajima) Nishizu, extended into Japan as far as the evidence permits. Every asserted person and relationship carries a transparent confidence score.
Tap or click a person for details. Drag with one finger or a mouse to pan; pinch, scroll, or use the controls to zoom.
These are research judgment scores, not mathematically sampled probabilities. They combine record independence, specificity, agreement, transcription risk, and whether the original document was inspected. A 94% parent link means the evidence strongly favors the relationship but an original SS-5, koseki, or comparable primary record is still desirable.
The discoveries below materially extend or correct the first version of the tree.
A NUMIDENT-derived Social Security record names them as the parents of Nobujiro Nishizu, born 30 October 1877 in Fukuoka.
Multiple prewar Japanese-language newspaper notices print this exact name, independently anchoring the family’s kanji and Nobujiro’s given-name characters.
Clarence Nishizu’s digitized 1931 itinerary explicitly marks Tachibana Village as the Nishizu family hometown. The place is now in Shingū Town.
WRA and Social Security-derived data converge on 1901. The cemetery memorial’s 26 August 1903 remains a serious alternative until the Hawaii birth record is obtained.
This uncommon spelling fits the surname reading and a historic Fukuoka concentration. It is not yet tied directly to Suguru’s own Japanese record.
A 1944 Manzanar Free Press item places Sam Osajima in the industrial division’s domestic sewing-machine repair operation.
| Claim | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|
| John was the son of Nobujiro/Shinjiro and Shige | 99% | Obituaries, WRA family grouping, sibling cross-checks. |
| Nobujiro and Shinjiro were the same man | 97% | Same spouse, children, age, residence, occupation, and life chronology. |
| Full name was 西津信次郎 | 98% | Repeated Japanese-language newspaper printing. |
| Tokuhei and Kane were his parents | 94% | NUMIDENT-derived parent fields tied to exact birth and SSN. |
| Family hometown was Tachibana Village | 99% | Federal birthplace plus Clarence’s oral-history map and 1931 family visit. |
| Claim | Score | Why |
|---|---|---|
| Trudes was daughter of Suguru and Shizue | 99% | Obituaries and WRA family grouping. |
| Suguru born 1 Apr 1897 in Kumamoto | 95% | Memorial, death index, WRA-linked sources. |
| Suguru arrived in 1915 | 92% | WRA Form 26 transcription; manifest not yet inspected. |
| Osajima kanji was 筬島 | 87% | Reading, rarity, regional distribution, but no personal Japanese document. |
| Shizue’s parents were Japan-born | 95% | WRA record states both parental birthplaces as Japan. |
Where evidence ends, chronology begins. This section deliberately distinguishes named ancestors from anonymous generational projections.
| Estimated generation | Approx. birth | What is actually known |
|---|---|---|
| Tokuhei & Kane | c. 1840–1860 | Named parents of a child born in 1877; no exact dates or village record yet. |
| Their parents | c. 1810–1840 | Biologically necessary, but names, households, and locations are unknown. |
| Earlier village households | 1700s | May survive in temple death registers, religious population registers, land books, or village papers. |
| 1600s ancestors | 1600–1699 | No documentary identity established. Surname continuity cannot substitute for a chain of households. |
Japanese commoners did not always use surnames consistently in the forms later recorded by modern civil registration. Edo-period shūmon ninbetsu aratamechō may identify people by household, status, village, and temple affiliation without providing a modern-style surname in every entry. The village and house linkage must therefore be rebuilt generation by generation.
Each rung unlocks the next. Skipping a rung is how invented pedigrees grow antlers.
Nobujiro’s SS-5/NUMIDENT, Suguru’s immigration file, Shizue’s SS-5 and Hawaii birth record, and Shige’s passenger manifest. These can supply exact parent names, maiden names, honseki, village, and nearest relative.
Request current/reconstructed family registers from Shingū for the Nishizu household and the correct Kumamoto municipality for Suguru once his village is known. A direct descendant normally needs proof of relationship.
Identify the family temple, grave plot, posthumous Buddhist names, and temple death book. These often bridge people born before the first modern koseki.
Search local archive holdings for religious population registers, household censuses, land and tax books, village headman papers, and cadastral records.
Accept a named ancestor only when consecutive household, temple, land, or probate-style records connect them to the proven line. A matching rare surname in the same village is a lead, not a pedigree.
The family lines moved through different Pacific corridors before converging in Southern California.
Schematic, not to geographic scale. Clarence Nishizu’s 1931 project coordinate places the family hometown in the former Tachibana Village, modern Shingū Town, near the Tachibanaguchi/Harukami corridor.
NUMIDENT-derived entry: Fukuoka, parents Tokuhei Nishizu and Kane Yasutake.
Local history records place him as a farmworker at Wheeler Ranch on Zinfandel Lane.
1973 profile says 1907 as a picture bride; WRA says 1908.
WRA Form 26 entry. Exact ship and port remain unresolved.
The two U.S.-born branches would later marry.
He met his father’s brothers, sisters, and relatives in the Nishizu household during a judo tour.
A federal memorandum records his custody shortly after Pearl Harbor.
The Nishizu family went through Pomona to Heart Mountain; the Osajima family was incarcerated at Manzanar.
Camp newspaper lists him in domestic sewing-machine repair.
Genealogy becomes reliable when the awkward evidence stays visible.
| Issue | Evidence A | Evidence B | Current judgment |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nobujiro vs Shinjiro | Family obituaries and Social Security derivative: Nobujiro | Federal detention and camp records: Shinjiro | Same man, 97%. Preserve both aliases until original Japanese/U.S. application is inspected. |
| Shige birth year | 1973 profile: 15 Nov 1887 | WRA: 1888 | 1887 favored, 85%; one-year age drift is common. |
| Shige arrival | Profile: Seattle in 1907 | WRA: 1908 | 1907 favored, 70%; passenger manifest needed. |
| Shizue birth | WRA + SSDI-derived: 6 Aug 1901 | Memorial/California index: 26 Aug 1903 | 1901 favored, 72%; Hawaii certificate decides. |
| Osajima kanji | 筬島 matches reading and regional surname | No Suguru document with kanji recovered | Probable at 87%, not yet a personal identity lock. |
| Kane surname kanji | Yasutake normally 安武 | Derivative record provides romanization only | 安武 at 80%; given-name characters unknown. |
These belong on the corkboard, not in the pedigree.
A Japan-born Nishikawa buried in Paauhau, Hawaii County. Geography and generation fit a possible father of Shizue, but there is no direct relationship evidence and Nishikawa is not rare enough to bridge the gap.
5–10% candidate onlyThe surname remains concentrated in the precise hometown corridor, including a Nishizu manufacturing business and current civic listings. This supports local surname continuity, not kinship to Tokuhei’s household.
<10% for any specific modern relationshipThe rare surname has a strong Fukuoka/Chikugo presence and local origin traditions. Suguru was born in neighboring Kumamoto, so migration across the prefectural border is plausible but unproved.
30% geographic hypothesisYasutake remains present in northern Fukuoka. Until Kane’s koseki or a marriage register is found, local surname survival cannot identify her parents.
20% regional leadDirect links are included for reproducibility. Some databases require a free account, subscription, physical visit, or descendant request.
| Source | Quality | Contribution |
|---|
These are the records most likely to replace anonymous boxes with named people.
Would directly verify Tokuhei and Kane, potentially preserve Japanese name spellings, and clarify Nobujiro/Shinjiro. The derivative is strong, but the original application is the gold rivet.
Using Nobujiro’s 30 October 1877 birth and Tachibana hometown, a direct descendant can ask Shingū’s Resident Division for koseki, joseki, and kaisei-gen-koseki. Proof of lineal relationship is normally required.
Should resolve 1901 versus 1903 and may name both parents, their ages, residences, and birthplaces. Hawaii’s 1896–1909 birth indexes are available at designated libraries; actual records are held by the Department of Health.
SSN 570-01-0874 is the leading identifier. The application may provide father’s name and mother’s maiden name, potentially unlocking both Japanese immigrant grandparents at once.
His 1915 arrival, exact birth date, and Kumamoto prefecture create a narrow search target. The manifest or passport register may give village, nearest relative, destination, and guarantor.
His book-length corrected transcript is held in the Iwao Ishino papers at Michigan State University. Because he described meeting his father’s siblings in Tachibana, it may name Japanese relatives or the family temple.
A picture-bride manifest can identify departure port, nearest relative, husband’s address, and village. It may also clarify whether Takayama was her birth surname and the exact kanji.
The town history museum collects local historical materials. Once the lot, temple, or household is identified, ask about old village maps, grave registers, religious population rolls, land books, and Tachibana Village papers.
No responsible public-web search can literally inspect every record. Some decisive materials are not name-indexed, are visible only as archival images, sit behind database accounts, or are legally restricted to descendants. The dossier records both the evidence found and the exact doors still closed.